WHERE I'M ?

WHERE IS THE OBSERVER ?

I 'm going to suggest a simple gedanken or thought experiment , which has added that it is not impossible with the future and perhaps can be performed within a few decades technology.Suppose a person has extended the " neural wiring " that comes from your spine and the same for the optic nerves. Earlier this person has understood by a brief explanation of the window effect that all things perceived both sees, touches , hears, tastes or smells are representations that occur inside your brain .After this explanation, the experimental subject is asked to take a pencil. You can accept no major traumas that the pencil you are holding is a mental representation that is generated in your brain.Then we lift the lid of the skull with a surgical saw and since your brain, no prior approval of adding " neural wiring " is an extension of neuronal stem and optic nerves , we extract his brain and put it in his hands. The subject of the experiment can see and touch your brain. If the Observer is clear that the touch and sight are generated insights into your brain will conclude with great surprise , that his brain is also a mental representation and therefore has no physical existence : it is a creation more of your senses , which now checks astonishment may not be the causal agent that allows you to perceive visually and tactilely .The question will arise , while holding your brain trembling hands, is the classic of philosophy and mysticism : What am I ? Or Where am I really ?However, to our volunteer shocks are not over. Since we also add fiber to their optic nerves , eyes retreated behind basins and separate at a reasonable distance and back , so that the subject can observe your brain and body to two meters away .If you then with a pin prick him his hand the subject will experience the puncture and the distance as your hand is removed from the stimulus.The key question is :Where do you feel the stimulus ?
 Recodemos that your body is watching from a distance. We can not say you feel the stimulus in his hand , as his YO behind his eyes at that moment. Then the subject will feel that his hand hurts, but the body memory of proprioception feel that this event has occurred in the vicinity of the observation point and not in the body .If then we ask you to close your eyes and prick again , feel that the stimulus was in his hand and no sense of distances from it.What this experiment tells us all ... ?The Observer , as indicated by the term "observe" is the precise point of receipt of the observed. Then I is the orthocenter to conclude that all perceptions are watching . The fact that our eyes are in front of our brain that , strictly speaking , are an extension of him, lie on the observer within the brain in the upper body , but since there is no body or brain and everything is merely a beam - perceptions , as Hume noted the Observer is ultimately the point of confluence of all perceptions .Then , the " window effect " is not as illusory as we declared at the beginning. We have finished - product of the snake 's tail , which bites the Observer at the end actually see out, but not from the basin of your eyes outwards as indicated by the popularly shared sense but from their point of view Observer to the entire environment , including important part of himself , which builds and justifies to give you that name .